Reliability Study of an Aerosol-Jet-Printed Fluorescence Quenching Sensor Array for the Identification and Quantification of Explosive Vapors in ACS Omega

Product Introduction

Equipment Parameters

I. Abstract of the Paper’s Core Research

This study prepared specialized aerosol inks using six distinct conjugated fluorescent polymers and digitally printed pixelated sensing arrays on glass substrates. By modulating the nozzle shutter duration to control the thickness of the deposited film, three sets of samples with varying deposition levels were constructed. Fluorescence quenching assays were conducted for nitrobenzene (NB), 1,3-dinitrobenzene (DNB), and 2,4-dinitrotoluene (DNT) at concentrations of 1, 3, and 10 ppb in air vapor. Recognition reliability was validated through LDA-based machine learning. The key findings are as follows:
  • Digitally controlled aerosol pixel patterning with precisely tunable deposition‑quantity gradients.

By employing three nozzle shutter‑time settings—0.5 s, 1 s, and 2 s—the deposition material can be graded in 2× or 4× increments. The printed structure exhibits uniform thickness in the central pixel region, with a thin annular ring forming only at the edges, thereby defining a central ROI for inspection and minimizing edge‑induced fluorescence interference.

  • Multi-polymer array–based characteristic quenching fingerprint spectra

The quenching efficiencies of the three explosives vary significantly across different fluorescent pixels: at a concentration of 10 ppb, DNT exhibits the highest quenching rate of 70%, DNB about 40%, and NB approximately 25%. Each substance possesses a unique response fingerprint, enabling reliable discrimination among them.

  • High-Reliability Classification and Recognition under Process Variability

When the deposition amount fluctuates by a factor of 2, the accuracy of explosive detection remains stable at 81%–96%; only when the deviation reaches a substantial fourfold increase does the detection accuracy for low-concentration nitrobenzene decline. Variations inherent in standard mass-production processes do not affect the stability of the detection results.

  • Low-Photobleaching Long-Term Sensing Substrate

Under a weak 6 μW UV irradiation for 4 hours, the average fluorescence decay of the polymer was less than 5%; in some materials, fluorescence exhibited a slight enhancement due to impurity desorption, and the sensor maintained stable signal output during long-term operation.

  • A Super-Simple LDA Recognition Model

It requires only a simple supervised linear discriminant algorithm, eliminating the need for complex deep learning; it can be deployed on low-power microcontrollers and is compatible with compact, portable security‑inspection devices featuring limited computational resources.

II. Process Flow and Core Advantages of the Complete Aerosol-Spray Sensing Array System

(1) Complete Fluorescent Sensor Array Fabrication Process

  • Oxygen plasma activation of the glass substrate enhances the adhesion of polymer films.
  • Six types of conjugated fluorescent polymers were individually dissolved in a toluene/tetralin mixed solvent to prepare aerosol‑specific inks.
  • Optomec aerosol‑jet equipment with a 200 µm nozzle, shutter control at 0.5/1/2 s, capable of printing single pixels; array pixel pitch is 4 mm, with intra‑unit pixel size of 0.5 mm.
  • The substrate is maintained at a constant temperature of 50°C for in-situ drying, enabling the solvent to evaporate at a uniform rate and yielding a standard pixel structure with a flat center and a thin peripheral ring.
  • A UV‑LED plus CCD imaging system was used to build a vapor‑detection platform, enabling quenching calibration and LDA modeling for explosive vapors across a 1–10 ppb concentration range.

(II) Five Core Processes (Comparison of Lithography, Inkjet, and Screen Printing)

  • Digital precision thickness control with high process variation tolerance.

The nozzle’s shutter time enables digital control of the total deposition amount, and even minor parameter drift during mass production does not compromise the material’s identification fingerprint. Moreover, the array exhibits far superior batch-to-batch consistency compared to other printing processes.

  • Multi-material one-click switching, one-step fabrication of composite sensor arrays.

A single device can continuously print six types of fluorescent polymer pixels, eliminating the need for multiple transfers and multilayer lithography; a single process step suffices to fabricate a multi-channel recognition array.

  • Low-temperature in situ drying ensures that the conjugated fluorescent material undergoes no thermal degradation.

The entire process employs low-temperature molding at 50°C, preserving the conjugated molecular luminescent structure and avoiding the fluorescence quenching and deactivation caused by high-temperature sintering.

  • Micrometer-scale pixel high-precision array formation

Sub-millimeter‑scale independent sensing units are arranged in a regular pattern, with crisp pixel boundaries and no cross‑talk; fluorescence signals from each channel remain mutually exclusive, resulting in enhanced fingerprint feature discrimination.

  • Maskless rapid iteration, low-cost R&D of security inspection sensors

No custom photolithography mask is required; by adjusting the array configuration and polymer formulation, new samples can be produced on the same day, significantly shortening the development cycle for novel explosive‑sensing formulations.

III. Five Core Technological Innovations of This Study

Innovation 1: A Reliability Evaluation System for Digital Gradient Deposition of Aerosols

Innovation enables quantitative analysis of how fluctuations in deposited mass during printing affect the accuracy of explosive detection, and identifies a stable recognition window under twice the process variation, thereby providing quantifiable quality‑control criteria for mass production.

Innovation 2 Center: ROI-Based Region Extraction and Denoising Detection Method

By employing a flat, thin film centered on the aerosol pixel as the effective detection zone, edge‑induced thick‑ring fluorescence crosstalk is suppressed, significantly reducing the standard deviation of array‑based data and enhancing quantitative accuracy.

Innovation 3: A Differentiated Fingerprint Sensing Architecture Based on Multi-Conjugated Polymer Arrays

Six fluorescent materials are combined to generate a multidimensional quenching fingerprint, enabling a single sensor to simultaneously distinguish among three classes of nitro‑based explosives and thereby overcoming the limitation of single‑material sensors lacking selectivity.

Innovative 4-Step Low-Light-Dropout Aerosol Fluorescent Film Forming Process

Low-temperature, slow drying inhibits photodegradation of the polymer, and prolonged UV exposure results in extremely low degradation, thereby meeting the equipment’s 24/7 continuous security inspection requirements.

Innovative 5‑axis lightweight LDA‑compatible sensing solution

The array output data is compatible with a minimalist linear discriminant algorithm, eliminating the need for high-end computing units and enabling integration into low-cost, handheld, portable security screening devices.

IV. Current Industry Challenges and Corresponding Solutions for Overcoming Them

Challenge 1: In conventional printing-array fabrication, even minor process variations can lead to recognition failure.

✅ The aerosol shutter enables digital, precise control of deposition thickness, with thickness‑variation detection accuracy remaining above 81% even at twice the nominal thickness, significantly enhancing production‑line fault tolerance.

Challenge 2: A single fluorescent thin film cannot distinguish among multiple nitro-based explosives; it can only provide qualitative identification, not quantitative analysis.

✅ A multipolymer array generates multidimensional quenching fingerprints, enabling substance classification when combined with LDA, along with simultaneous quantitative detection of vapor concentrations.

Challenge 3: Lithography array processes are complex and costly, and flexible substrates are difficult to accommodate.

✅ Maskless direct aerosol writing enables printing on both glass and flexible PI substrates, significantly reducing prototyping costs for small‑batch security‑screening sensors.

Challenge 4: Fluorescent thin films are prone to photobleaching under prolonged UV irradiation, resulting in a short equipment lifespan.

✅ A conjugated membrane formed via mild 50°C drying, with fluorescence decay of less than 5% under 4 hours of continuous illumination, demonstrating long-term stability in online monitoring.

Challenge 5: Complex AI models cannot be adapted to handheld, low-power security screening devices.

✅ Equipped with the lightweight Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA) algorithm, it requires extremely low computational resources, enabling real-time identification of vapor types and concentrations even on standard microcontrollers.

V. Future Diversified Industrial Application Scenarios

  • Portable Handheld Explosives Detector for Stations and Airports
A disposable aerosol fluorescence sensing chip, paired with a compact UV‑CCD device, enables rapid screening for trace explosive residues on luggage and human bodies.
  • Rapid Screening for Trace Explosives at Border Inspection Stations
Portable outdoor optoelectronic sniffing device that provides real-time detection of nitro‑based vapors at the ppb level in ambient air, with the capability to distinguish between different explosive types.
  • Fully Automated Security Inspection Module for Logistics Packages
The production line integrates a sensor array to enable real-time, high-throughput vapor detection, replacing bulky mass spectrometry instruments and reducing security‑screening costs.
  • Front-end Miniature Sensor Module for Military Explosive Ordnance Disposal Robots
A compact, lightweight array is mounted on explosive ordnance disposal equipment to detect explosive vapor at long range, ensuring personnel safety.
  • High-Performance Security Sensor Laboratory Rapid Prototyping Platform
A desktop aerosol device enables the rapid fabrication of multi-component fluorescent sensor arrays, and various hazardous‑chemical identification algorithms can be swiftly validated.
Image and Text Guide

Figure 1. Schematic diagram of the experimental setup, illustrating the vapor transport system based on osmotic action and the optical apparatus used for fluorescence quenching detection.

Figure 2. UV‑excited sample set: (a) P1, (b) P2, and (c) P3, as imaged by the camera. In each array, the fluorescence signals from top to bottom and left to right correspond to SY, PG, PB, PW, PFO, and F8BT, respectively; (d) SEM image of the printed structure with regions of interest (ROIs) annotated; (e) Schematic of a typical cross‑section.

Table 1. Average Absolute Fluorescence Intensities Measured in Air for Each Polymer

Figure 3. Optical decay of polymer fluorescence after 4 hours of excitation with a light intensity of 6 μW across the entire sample area, under a dry air flow of 1 L/min. For each polymer pixel, the error bars represent the standard deviation of 12 structures within each sample group.

Figure 4. QE patterns for three distinct sample groups: (a) P1, (b) P2, and (c) P3. Error bars are defined, and polymer identifiers are consistent with those in Figure 3.

Table 2. Mean and Standard Deviation (%) of Quantitative Metrics (QEs) Across All Experiments

Figure 5. (a) P1, (b) P2, and (c) P3: two-dimensional distribution plots of the LDA-trained models. Ellipses indicate the 95% confidence regions for each target class, with the explained variance values shown in parentheses.

Table 3. Accuracy (%) of Discriminative Reproducibility

Download Materials

Related Products Other Achievements Related Videos

Product Inquiry

Submit Message

*Note: Please ensure that all information provided is accurate and that your contact details are up to date, so we can reach you as soon as possible.