Preparation of All-Solid-State Batteries via 3D Aerosol-Jet Printing in Advanced Energy Materials

Product Introduction

Equipment Parameters

I. Core Research Summary

  • Pioneering an integrated AJP solid-state battery manufacturing process

An aerosol-jet printing process is employed to sequentially deposit the LFP composite cathode and a solvent-free PEGDA-based solid-state polymer electrolyte (SPE), followed by in-situ UV crosslinking. This approach ensures seamless wetting between the electrode and the electrolyte, thereby fundamentally reducing interfacial charge-transfer resistance. The cathode active-material loading can reach approximately 10 mg/cm², while the surface‑adjacent pure electrolyte layer is only 24 μm thick.

  • Excellent electrochemical performance at both room temperature and elevated temperatures.

At 30°C and a low C-rate of 0.05C, the battery delivers a specific capacity exceeding 130 mAh/g; when the temperature is raised to 60°C and charged at a fast rate of 0.3C, the capacity surpasses 160 mAh/g, approaching the theoretical capacity of LFP, which is 170 mAh/g.

  • Diaphragm modification addresses the issue of high-temperature lithium dendrite-induced short circuits.

In membrane-free batteries, high-temperature cycling often leads to lithium dendrite penetration of the separator and internal short circuits. By incorporating an impregnated SPE porous separator–composite electrolyte layer, battery stability is significantly enhanced: at 60°C and a 0.3C rate, after 150 cycles, the capacity retention reaches 97.4%, with an average coulombic efficiency of 99.98%.

  • The process has strong versatility.

Aerosol printing is compatible with high-solid-content cathode slurries and solvent-free crosslinked electrolytes, offering a significantly broader viscosity window than conventional 3D‑printing methods such as direct ink writing and FDM. It requires no masks, enables large‑area fabrication, and is well suited for the production of large‑scale solid‑state energy storage devices.

II. Complete Operating Principle of Aerosol Spraying

This study employs Optomec’s aerosol jet printing system, leveraging pneumatic atomization combined with coaxial sheath‑gas focusing to achieve layered, integrated deposition. The entire process is divided into four steps:
  • Microdroplet atomization

The ink is introduced into the atomization chamber, where ultrasonic atomization generates ultrafine aerosol droplets measuring 2–5 μm. Argon gas serves as the carrier gas, transporting these droplets to the printing nozzle. The two inks—positive electrode slurry and solvent-free electrolyte precursor—can be atomized and printed independently.

  • Sheath-gas–assisted precise beam focusing

The nozzle is supplied with a coaxial argon sheath gas, which forms an annular airflow that compresses the aerosol plume. The distance between the print head and the substrate is adjustable from 2 to 10 mm and remains unaffected by substrate surface irregularities or porous structures. This design fully addresses the common issue of inkjet nozzle clogging and enables long‑term continuous printing.

  • Layered Stacked Deposition

First, the LFP cathode is printed, vacuum-dried, and then rolled to a porosity of 60%. Second, a solvent-free SPE precursor is printed in multiple layers; the liquid electrolyte can fully infiltrate the cathode’s internal porous channels, rather than remaining only at the surface.

  • UV crosslinking curing and molding

After electrolyte printing, UV‑induced crosslinking and curing are performed, eliminating the need for solvent evaporation and establishing a continuous ion‑transport network. A reinforced electrolyte layer can be sequentially deposited by impregnation as required, followed by integration with a metallic lithium anode to fabricate a half‑cell.

III. Five Core Technological Innovations of This Study

Innovation 1: In-situ integrated printing of electrodes and electrolytes, eliminating interfacial voids.

In conventional processes, the electrode and electrolyte are prepared separately and then hot‑pressed together, leaving air gaps at the pores and resulting in extremely high interfacial impedance. By contrast, our approach directly infiltrates a liquid electrolyte precursor into the porous cathode; subsequent UV curing establishes a continuous ion-conducting pathway. SEM and EDX elemental analysis confirm that the electrolyte is uniformly distributed throughout the entire cathode, with an interfacial contact resistance of only 34 Ω.

Innovation 2: Solvent-free solid-state electrolyte aerosol–printable formulation

Conventional solid-state electrolyte inks contain large amounts of volatile solvents, which shrink upon printing and leave gaps. In contrast, this system employs a PEGDA‑crosslinked precursor that is entirely free of volatile solvents; after printing, it undergoes direct photopolymerization, yielding a smooth, dense film with thickness precisely tunable within the 20–50 μm range.

Innovation 3: Stable Preparation of Ultra-High-Area-Capacity Cathodes

Conventional 3D‑printed electrodes typically exhibit a surface loading of less than 5 mg/cm², whereas this process enables single‑layer printing with an LFP loading of approximately 10 mg/cm², balancing high energy density with continuous ion transport pathways and addressing the critical challenges of excessive ion‑transport distances and severe polarization in thick electrodes.

Innovation 4: A porous separator–composite strategy to suppress lithium dendrite formation

During high-temperature cycling, pure polymer electrolytes are prone to puncture by lithium dendrites. By incorporating an 83%‑porosity Solupor separator pre‑impregnated with the electrolyte, the resulting composite electrolyte achieves a total thickness of approximately 70 μm, physically inhibiting dendrite growth and significantly enhancing safety under high‑temperature cycling conditions.

Innovation 5: Broad viscosity compatibility, suitable for multiple solid-state systems.

Compared with direct-write DIW and fused deposition modeling (FDM), aerosol printing can fabricate high-viscosity cathode inks, low-viscosity crosslinked electrolytes, and inorganic‑ceramic composite solid-state inks, enabling the multi-layer fabrication of an entire battery within a single device and simplifying production‑line equipment configuration.

IV. Existing Process Challenges and Corresponding Breakthrough Solutions Proposed in This Thesis

Challenge 1: In high-temperature cycling, pure thin electrolytes are prone to lithium dendrite formation, leading to soft short circuits.

Problem: In a 20–30 μm-thick single-layer SPE, under long-term cycling at 60°C, lithium dendrites formed on the lithium metal anode penetrate the electrolyte, leading to oscillations in the charge–discharge curves and eventual battery failure.

✅ Solution: Introduce a porous separator impregnated with a solid electrolyte to construct a composite barrier layer, physically inhibiting dendrite growth and stabilizing the high-temperature cycling system.

Challenge 2: Slow ion diffusion in thick cathodes leads to a sharp drop in high-rate capacity.

Issue: At a high loading of 10 mg/cm², the cathode exhibits substantial thickness and significant ionic transport resistance at room temperature, leading to a pronounced capacity fade above 0.1C.

✅ Solution: Increase the operating temperature to 60°C to enhance the ionic conductivity of the polymer electrolyte, enabling 0.3C fast charging and achieving a capacity close to the theoretical value.

Challenge 3: In electrolyte printing, it is difficult to balance layer thickness with wetting performance.

Problem: Too few printing layers fail to fully cover the positive electrode, while too many layers result in an excessively thick electrolyte, increasing the ion transport distance.

✅ Solution: 25 print layers yield an approximately 23 μm‑thick pure electrolyte top layer, while the precursor fully penetrates the 80 μm‑thick cathode, optimizing both interfacial contact and ion‑transport distance.

Challenge 4: The initial interface of new and old batteries is unstable, leading to rapid capacity decay in the early stages.

Issue: The interface layer of the newly assembled battery has not fully formed, resulting in a continuous capacity decline during the first few hundred cycles.

✅ Solution: The battery is allowed to rest for four weeks to undergo pre‑aging, thereby forming a stable interfacial passivation layer in advance; after 150 cycles, the capacity retention rate remains as high as 97.4%.

Challenge 5: Conventional printing viscosity constraints prevent the simultaneous fabrication of thick electrodes and ultrathin electrolytes.

Issue: Direct writing is only suitable for high-viscosity slurries, making it difficult to fabricate ultra-thin solid electrolytes with thicknesses below 20 μm.

✅ Solution: Aerosol jetting with broad viscosity compatibility—using the same device to sequentially print a high-solid-content cathode and a low-viscosity crosslinked electrolyte, enabling integrated additive manufacturing.

V. Future Application Prospects of Aerosol-Printed All-Solid-State Batteries

1. High-Safety Solid-State Power Battery for Vehicles

Traditional liquid‑state lithium batteries pose fire and explosion risks, whereas all‑solid‑state batteries with aerosol‑based integration eliminate flammable electrolytes and, thanks to high‑loading electrodes, deliver extended range. They can also be printed into custom curved shapes, seamlessly adapting to the irregular spatial configurations of automotive battery packs.

2. Aerospace Special Energy Storage Equipment

Aerospace and satellite applications demand stringent safety standards, and solid-state systems effectively prevent thermal runaway. Aerosol‑based printing enables direct fabrication of batteries on irregular curved substrates, while a lightweight design reduces the payload of aerospace vehicles and ensures robust performance across a wide operating temperature range.

3. Large-scale stationary energy storage power stations

The roll-to-roll continuous aerosol printing process is compatible with large‑area solid‑state battery modules, delivering a long cycle life with 97.4% capacity retention and reducing energy‑storage replacement costs. It eliminates electrolyte leakage and is well suited for indoor energy‑storage facilities.

4. Flexible Wearable Energy Storage Devices

Aerosol‑free‑contact printing enables the fabrication of solid‑state batteries on flexible PET and textile substrates, featuring ultrathin electrolytes without rigid separators, making them well suited for smartwatches, flexible sensors, and portable power‑supply devices for outdoor wearables.

5. Miniature Medical Devices and IoT Power Supplies

Maskless digital printing enables the customization of micron-scale solid-state microbatteries, providing long‑lasting, safe power supplies tailored for implantable medical devices and passive sensor chips.
Image and Text Guide

Figure 1. a) Schematic diagram of the AJP fabrication process; b) Schematic diagram of the layered cathode/electrolyte formation process.

Figure 2. Schematic of the printing process and corresponding top-view SEM images: a) as‑printed LFP; b) LFP printed to 60% porosity; c) electrode after ten SPE printing steps and UV crosslinking; d) electrode after twenty SPE printing steps.

Figure 3. a) Cross-sectional SEM images of the printed electrode material and its EDX scan; b) Relative weight ratios of phosphorus to carbon measured at different locations within the electrode material; c) EDX elemental maps of carbon; d) EDX elemental maps of phosphorus.

Figure 4. Battery performance testing of the printed ASSB at 30°C. a) Cycling curve of the ASSB at 30°C and a rate of 0.05C; b) Typical charge–discharge curve of the composite electrode. The cell configuration is Li || printed SPE || printed LFP; the thickness of the pure SPE layer is 23 μm, and the cathode mass loading is 9.6 mg·cm⁻².

Figure 5. a) Performance of the enhanced composite‑electrode button cell over a rate range from 0.1 C to 1 C at 60°C; b) Charge–discharge curves of the enhanced composite‑electrode cell at various rates; c) Long‑cycle test results of the novel enhanced composite‑electrode cell at a rate of 0.3 C; d) Representative charge–discharge curves for the first 40 cycles; e) Long‑cycle performance of an “aged” enhanced composite‑electrode cell at 60°C and 0.3 C. The cathode mass loading is 9.8 mg·cm⁻².

 

 



Keywords


Download Materials

Related Products Other Achievements Related Videos

Product Inquiry

Submit Message

*Note: Please ensure that all information provided is accurate and that your contact details are up to date, so we can reach you as soon as possible.